From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23313 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 20:30:55 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 20:30:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 20822 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2003 20:30:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 18304 Received: (qmail 20792 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2003 20:30:22 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 20:30:21 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [216.27.190.146] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 26 Feb 2003 20:30:20 -0000 Received: from ceramic.fifi.org (mail@ceramic.fifi.org [216.27.190.147]) by tantale.fifi.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id MAA07013; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:30:19 -0800 Received: from phil by ceramic.fifi.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18o8C2-0004hx-00; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:30:18 -0800 To: "Bart Schaefer" Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: Cant fg a suspended su (4.1.0-dev-7) References: <200302211807.h1LI74n23531@aragorn.cortexmachina.com> <87r89v7ef3.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> <1030226162557.ZM25106@candle.brasslantern.com> From: Philippe Troin Date: 26 Feb 2003 12:30:18 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1030226162557.ZM25106@candle.brasslantern.com> Message-ID: <87isv6yecl.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Philippe Troin "Bart Schaefer" writes: > On Feb 25, 10:18pm, Philippe Troin wrote: > } > } While I was perusing bash's sources, I found out that we could > } also improve pgid handling when doing builtin_exec(). On the way > } too... > > Is anybody else a bit leery of actually copying code from the bash > sources? > > Zsh is not GPL'd and I don't want it to become so. Who said I was copying code from bash? I just mentionned I was looking how bash was behaving and how its behavior was implemented. By doing this I found out that we did one thing wrong w.r.t. exec. That's all. BTW, I found out that bash has a couple of problems when dealing with the same case. I obviously do not want zsh to have the same problems. I don't believe that checking out how a given feature is implemented in a GPL'ed program counts as "copying code" or "infecting zsh with GPL" or whatever. Tell me if I'm wrong. Phil.