From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4564 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2016 18:00:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 38028 Received: (qmail 14343 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2016 18:00:03 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to:subject:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=sUNyOU02RwvwISuwdFj6PpAyV18=; b=OleiKP8/WgshX6nqsk fV6Tsqroz2SggY/zzBHmbfd8phlDSU0+7T/w+58tC6HPvB1tURkG3m2ucsOp3Bei IfmyoAE40fQi0Fc8XxOI7AONdgGtbg3Zkca92rsONsCd7CoZDkq28ofxZRbl+qhe e9l8/IQEMVQjlitMt0opXENJQ= From: Greg Klanderman To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: ZSH_SCRIPT Reply-To: Greg Klanderman Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:59:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160225093344.0d2499d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> (Peter Stephenson's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:33:44 +0000") Message-ID: <87r3g08ycp.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.22 (linux) References: <22221.59800.803540.618862@lwm.klanderman.net> <160224143153.ZM28994@torch.brasslantern.com> <20160225093344.0d2499d5@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SG-EID: i+zOheVB0lMUqP0z3X/8PPLe+C1hDfxH7g5ommK/LCqkVs1iM0pI4z38jHW1MoAgO8Zvuz/BVivxcp gbH0YkBptW1OhkVpfzeKEw4tqL+QVBsu15w2t7wfM81V/c7XnZwDQch3FJ9okX8LJhCK0l5W78o6a/ sH3r7TzYjbVc+Q+pPdh/WCbAaOR0soJVc32Av5c5C6VWXjJcDxfx9RYWsQ== >>>>> On February 25, 2016 Peter Stephenson wrote: > The variable is new --- we could have a different one to make the POSIX > $0 permanently available. Hi Peter and Bart, Are you saying this is new enough that it can still be changed? I would be OK leaving it, and adding another variable as I had originally proposed, but I do think that ZSH_SCRIPT is a bit better name for what I had originally proposed, i.e. the name of the script or empty, and that something like ZSH_ARGZERO might be better for what is currently called ZSH_SCRIPT. LKM what you prefer, and if you want me to submit a patch. thank you, Greg