From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-30265-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 17065 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2012 19:47:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 30265
Received: (qmail 409 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2012 19:47:11 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
	SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at bewatermyfriend.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org>
To: Wayne Davison <wayned@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: git mirror missing 4.3.16 tag (was: Re: zsh 4.3.16)
In-Reply-To: <CAD77+gQiqPgs7qGOab-Ai-Hob1BB3AEAFSx_M7BwQRRHWBtGmw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Richard Hartmann's message of "Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:52:48 +0100")
References: <20120219195359.7f3e301d@pws-pc.ntlworld.com>
	<120219144625.ZM21541@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<120219145406.ZM21556@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<120219145904.ZM21582@torch.brasslantern.com>
	<20120220103554.529613bc@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
	<CAD77+gQiqPgs7qGOab-Ai-Hob1BB3AEAFSx_M7BwQRRHWBtGmw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux)
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:47:17 +0100
Message-ID: <87r4xl72nu.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Df-Sender: [pbs]MzQ5NTM4

Hello Wayne,

It seems like the cvs-to-git script didn't pick up the zsh-4.3.16 tag
from CVS. It appears in CVS:

[...]
RCS file: /cvsroot/zsh/zsh/ChangeLog,v
Working file: ChangeLog
head: 1.5593
branch:
locks: strict
access list:
symbolic names:
        zsh-4_3_16: 1.5590
[...]

Richard Hartmann wrote:
> We want to prepare a package for Debian and thus wanted to make sure
> we get the correct commit. ATM, we are betting on either [1] or [2],
> but would appreciate confirmation either way.
[...]
> [1] http://zsh.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=zsh/zsh;a=commitdiff;h=5f25bb8223d090d13af5869893fa35e5b8c44182
> [2] http://zsh.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=zsh/zsh;a=commitdiff;h=66d61af2b5dcb5171ea96faedcccff0f045d6231

...so I think it should be on the commit referenced in [1].

Any idea why it didn't propagate to the git mirror?

Regards, Frank