Job management puzzle/bug?

Job management puzzle/bug?

[Andreas Kloeckner]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1046 bytes --]

Hi all,

here's a zsh behavior I don't understand:

...(program output)
^C...(program keeps running, ignores SIGINT)
...
^Z
[1]  + 29395 suspended  python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()'
$ kill %1
$ jobs                                                                                                                                                                                                                  andreas@ding 20:01
[1]  + suspended  python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()'
$ kill -9 %1
kill: kill %1 failed: no matching process
$ jobs                                                                                                                                                                                                                  andreas@ding 20:01
[1]  + suspended  python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()'


In particular, I don't understand why %1 still shows up in the output of
'jobs' when the process is long gone. bash behaves more like I'd expect.

(btw--please cc me)

Thanks,
Andreas

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: Job management puzzle/bug?

[Bart Schaefer]

[Accidentally sent this just to Andreas, resending for zsh-workers]

Apparently you shouldn't send multipart/signed mail to the zsh mailing
lists.  Either the list server stripped off the first set of part
headers, or something messed it up on your end, but either way I got a
garbled message and had to dig the actual text out of the raw message
in order to quote it here.

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Andreas Kloeckner <inform@tiker.net> wrote:
>
> here's a zsh behavior I don't understand:
>
> ^Z
> [1] + 29395 suspended python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()'
> $ kill %1
> $ jobs andreas@ding 20:01
> [1] + suspended python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()'
> $ kill -9 %1
> kill: kill %1 failed: no matching process

This is probably one of the interrelated bugs that were fixed by
zsh-workers/29769 or 29677 or 29481.  Is it possible for you to try to
reproduce this with zsh-4.3.13, released just this past week?

Re: Job management puzzle/bug?

[Andreas Kloeckner]

On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:29:59 -0800, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com> wrote:
> Apparently you shouldn't send multipart/signed mail to the zsh mailing
> lists.  Either the list server stripped off the first set of part
> headers, or something messed it up on your end, but either way I got a
> garbled message and had to dig the actual text out of the raw message
> in order to quote it here.

Sorry about that, this one's unsigned.

> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Andreas Kloeckner <inform@tiker.net> wrote:
> >
> > here's a zsh behavior I don't understand:
> >
> > ^Z
> > [1] + 29395 suspended python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()'
> > $ kill %1
> > $ jobs andreas@ding 20:01
> > [1] + suspended python test_quad.py 'test_integral_equation()'
> > $ kill -9 %1
> > kill: kill %1 failed: no matching process
> 
> This is probably one of the interrelated bugs that were fixed by
> zsh-workers/29769 or 29677 or 29481.  Is it possible for you to try to
> reproduce this with zsh-4.3.13, released just this past week?

Ah, fixed in 4.3.13. Thanks! (and props to Debian for having 4.3.13 as
zsh-beta already)

Andreas