From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 15782 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2022 16:20:46 -0000 Received: from zero.zsh.org (2a02:898:31:0:48:4558:7a:7368) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 14 Jan 2022 16:20:46 -0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; cv=none; a=rsa-sha256; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; t=1642177246; b=UxIXbUX5s87Ts6QC3Y4J+h0yfmXto8otEdk8xIwt6Q9Bup41cGW9pNwlIIyO0NwzOI8JH/7n2T N0+ufmVGG7kay9JwQ5mY8eiHwFZ8QesDO5LQV47m6CMr9UW3rLtX7YTWZPxDF5YwaZTy7zH4JF qD9jmEtYB5ed95BdV7Vo5aBLIFpt4TbDc+67xKRPV+e4gSYSF+ns30xX+0JjJtAetezscUB035 00xlrqJ3yNnEJrIMRGhqjqnR5kQB6hZOboTxydFUWslykTdmntZb+ywEhWDc3tcqXVci5/m20k wnNlITYuDFmGnY9Xihu1nM8IQJvipuTRkizn9vTbB7gnIw==; ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; zsh.org; iprev=pass (so254-31.mailgun.net) smtp.remote-ip=198.61.254.31; dkim=pass header.d=klanderman.net header.s=mg header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=klanderman.net; arc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; t=1642177246; bh=s7CStNZk08GVDN15hafXm7cRFhFCA51ncJP6o56Gmfk=; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Date:Reply-To:Subject:To:From:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature; b=ZDj1ZEHvvRa5UspAfFYt0AAWj7oEIY58Z3cETZUM88RnqKAJ39WP5uPBw06SuHSxACX4/fyi0Z pFk8JGY6aATHE3b/2Mxhl0+mrYCcVIfdbcmItYLMNcwOy9SJ38bnHY4yJ/TSgwle94oioOcwit kmxnHDNuWG5Kx1I714c1q2RtMifOBC5FITg0RvE6Zdpje23CD9dCUcNT7In/qrC/d4wPOOdqhW AgTyFULOXMSqE5SF/+a+StCMeZ9aqfJwLzhCWdJ8pc/8F/koy05bHWG1ggHGHhuHw6qCzuCoPG /5JW9l0+Nh5PHMjIhav6Qith2VLmDmQXFpzaLYLloW9MRg==; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zsh.org; s=rsa-20210803; h=List-Archive:List-Owner:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Id:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=LYlVxXnTzw16viPKX6ptMz31tq0P0RqCzJQxKhtmpoQ=; b=dDtCxflO/NS0BdnAsZn6klfdUQ ZUJcedyAE73oE9HxLyYzMMeeHTfw84wi0nI+2Q3Ib5AFGwARRmpKGPjQ1IENKfmAVj//Bz6VxpguZ 7Iqnbp8ZOvUhFMohr6GawvTnmCRXpIaKyoYP0GxsGkYYPUaL/kn8J1VPdgORc9oRdEZ7ZWnrJ45FK lOYExUmjVfljr0QCXd9qirFka7QCTX1zPDbt6NVh0KoYfH76eU5Z+bZ+ATEi6wvuCCwNCYiN8RIM3 +pH3hCwX9zEk72HQODZk0VlODi6kneBDXy5l63WnUusYaadgYi5rt77b3QcCuQcI4t+1665VdBkYN y0IFVG3g==; Received: from authenticated user by zero.zsh.org with local id 1n8PJl-000Pib-Mt; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:20:45 +0000 Authentication-Results: zsh.org; iprev=pass (so254-31.mailgun.net) smtp.remote-ip=198.61.254.31; dkim=pass header.d=klanderman.net header.s=mg header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=klanderman.net; arc=none Received: from so254-31.mailgun.net ([198.61.254.31]:28017) by zero.zsh.org with utf8esmtps (TLS1.3:TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1n8PId-000POr-0I; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:19:35 +0000 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=klanderman.net; q=dns/txt; s=mg; t=1642177174; h=Content-Type: MIME-Version: References: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Date: Reply-To: Subject: To: From: Sender; bh=LYlVxXnTzw16viPKX6ptMz31tq0P0RqCzJQxKhtmpoQ=; b=SclRJMng3Mo2+B4UlAk87ejDaCyWuPx0SXAy5oG0VpOZrnqodFilOcG+6O/yDh0cOlN86XCi OdSt2lgNM92PamR9/W7clBVaYCn74jQfuWY3rnkqN+YTQ2pRvp4wa5axR3AamjOcu0P/geOP 49vpWqFiSaF16DuO+2ZcbDgFuO4= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.31 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyIwZjNkNyIsICJ6c2gtd29ya2Vyc0B6c2gub3JnIiwgIjk3ZGJkOCJd Received: from smtp2.klanderman.net (smtp2.klanderman.net [142.93.10.110]) by smtp-out-n06.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 61e1a29506362278a18f8a2c (version=TLS1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:19:33 GMT Received: from lwm.klanderman.net (pool-72-93-77-73.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [72.93.77.73]) by smtp2.klanderman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 624A741459; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:19:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by lwm.klanderman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29A9129E1F03; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:19:33 -0500 (EST) From: Greg Klanderman To: zsh-workers@zsh.org Subject: Re: New Zsh Logo Reply-To: Greg Klanderman Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:19:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Jim's message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2022 07:22:04 -0600") Message-ID: <87y23ip9wq.fsf@lwm.klanderman.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.24 (linux) References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Seq: 49690 Archived-At: X-Loop: zsh-workers@zsh.org Errors-To: zsh-workers-owner@zsh.org Precedence: list Precedence: bulk Sender: zsh-workers-request@zsh.org X-no-archive: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: >>>>> On January 14, 2022 Jim wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:31 PM Matthew Martin wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:02:06PM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote: >> > Here are the three current choices --- not quite final, but definitely >> > getting there. Looks like variant 3 is our favourite at the moment. >> The rest of this may be too nit picky. I guess if we're picking nits I might as well jump in.. :-) > FWIW if not to be to nit picky myself, why '%'? Historically '%' was the default > csh prompt. Whereas '$' was the Bourne shell default for users. '>' was the > default secondary prompt(not just a dos prompt). Zsh is more Bourne then csh. > In reality prompt can be set to almost anything. Of course, personally I use '|', but given the zsh default is '%', that seems like the right choice here. > I also feel that there should be a break between the right vertical bar > and the "H". Agreed, I think that would look better, either square or rounded to match V1/V2/V3. > If 'Z' and 'H'(V3) are going to be rounded shouldn't 'S' be rounded too? I hadn't noticed that, good catch! A few additional nits: reduce excess space between the letters in V1/V2 in all three the "S" is a few pixels too tall (at the top; baseline is right) the "H" looks much too narrow to me in all three, but that seems to be mostly an optical illusion, as it is the same width as the 'S', though both are narrower than the 'Z' (I only looked closely at V3). Possibly adding a break between the top right of the 'H' and the right vertical bar as suggested above will help? I agree with Matthew that the bar in the percent sign should be at a steeper angle, and comparable thickness to the circles. already mentioned above, but a little more space needed between '%' and '_' in V1/V3; V2 is good. > As far as the overall design, very nice. Nice work. Yes, they really look great! Greg