From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-workers-return-27632-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 2384 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2010 00:13:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 27632
Received: (qmail 3281 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2010 00:13:15 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
	autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at bewatermyfriend.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
From: Frank Terbeck <ft@bewatermyfriend.org>
To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
Cc: zsh-workers@zsh.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: PATCH: Add `sourcetrace' option
In-Reply-To: <100123154600.ZM27196@torch.brasslantern.com> (Bart Schaefer's
	message of "Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:46:00 -0800")
References: <2d460de71001231216x76bd0320y2bd29c31c685ca26@mail.gmail.com>
	<1264283601-27005-1-git-send-email-ft@bewatermyfriend.org>
	<alpine.LNX.2.01.1001231704010.20648@hp.internal>
	<873a1wxxxg.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org>
	<100123154600.ZM27196@torch.brasslantern.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:10:24 +0100
Message-ID: <87y6joz7kf.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Df-Sender: 430444

Bart Schaefer writes:
> On Jan 23, 11:23pm, Frank Terbeck wrote:
> } Benjamin R. Haskell writes:
> } [...]
> } > Missed a word or two:
> } >
> } > +If set, zsh will print an informational message announcing the name of
> } > +each file it loads.  A file may be loaded by the shell itself when it
> } >            ^^^
> } >
> } > (or 'as it'?)
> } 
> } Well, I'm not a native speaker; so, if you say that `as it' sounds more
> } correct, that's probably true.
>
> No, "it" rather than "as it" would be right here.  However, your patch
> just said "file loads" so the "it" still needs to be inserted.

Oh boy. I was *sure* I had it with the `it' in it. That's why I only
argued the 'as it'... Sorry about that.

I'll send an updated patch in a jiffy.

Regards, Frank