From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16266 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2010 13:50:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Workers List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 27652 Received: (qmail 4136 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2010 13:50:51 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received-SPF: none (ns1.primenet.com.au: domain at bewatermyfriend.org does not designate permitted sender hosts) From: Frank Terbeck To: Peter Stephenson Cc: "Zsh Hackers' List" Subject: Re: Want to replace bash w zsh as system shell on Ubuntu In-Reply-To: <20100203133809.0ae0c69f@news01> (Peter Stephenson's message of "Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:38:09 +0000") References: <20100202081546.GA5930@panix.com> <87vdefkeuf.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> <20100202150639.4ee8d46c@news01> <20100203133809.0ae0c69f@news01> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:50:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87zl3q5sy6.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Df-Sender: 430444 Peter Stephenson wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:06:39 +0000 > Peter Stephenson wrote: >> Would need some documentation. > > This, I think. The fact that ulimit is now present when starting in an > emulation mode (I'm not sure of the best way to phrase that) doesn't need > documenting, we never actually said it wasn't, which is an omission given > it's listed as a builtin (hence the sched change, too). [...] > +The tt(limit) command is not made available by default when the ^^^^^^^^^-- tt(unlimit), right? > +shell starts in a mode emulating another shell. It can be made available > +with the command `tt(zmodload -F zsh/rlimits b:unlimit)'. Apart from that, I think this covers the changes nicely. Regards, Frank -- In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. -- RFC 1925