From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gatech.edu (gatech.edu [128.61.1.1]) by werple.mira.net.au (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA28069 for ; Fri, 19 May 1995 02:32:50 +1000 Received: from math (math.skiles.gatech.edu) by gatech.edu with SMTP id AA02585 (5.65c/Gatech-10.0-IDA for ); Thu, 18 May 1995 12:32:30 -0400 Received: by math (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA05291; Thu, 18 May 1995 12:30:25 -0400 Resent-Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 10:30:21 -0600 Old-Return-Path: Date: Thu, 18 May 1995 10:30:21 -0600 Message-Id: <9505181630.AA20146@revelle> From: mdb@cdc.noaa.gov (Mark Borges) To: coleman@math.gatech.edu Cc: ZSH mailing list Subject: Re: new zsh mailing list up and running In-Reply-To: <9505180204.AA00391@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> References: <9505180204.AA00391@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado X-Attribution: mb Resent-Message-Id: <"0gw8c2.0.bI1.VOtkl"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/5 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu >> Richard Coleman(RC) wrote on Wed, 17 May 1995 22:04:00 -0400: RC> I use (and highly recommend) procmail. If it helps anyone, I'll RC> attach the procmail recipes I'm using to filter the new zsh RC> mailing lists. Thanks! I know this is not a zsh question, but... I've never used it (procmail) before -- I've been using elm's filter(1) -- but this looks much more flexible and powerful. I've skimmed through the man pages, and I think I understand what you're doing below except for: RC> ######################## RC> :0 w: zsh-announce/$LOCKEXT RC> * ^Resent-from: *zsh-announce RC> | rcvstore +zsh-announce <<<<---- RC> :0 w: zsh-users/$LOCKEXT RC> * ^Resent-from: *zsh-users RC> | rcvstore +zsh-users RC> :0 w: zsh-workers/$LOCKEXT RC> * ^Resent-from: *zsh-workers RC> | rcvstore +zsh-workers RC> ######################### I gather you're filtering the mail through some external program (rcvstore) we don't have. Why? If you have time, can you explain a bit more what the above recipe accomplishes? Also, in contrast to zsh-list, SmartList doesn't appear to provide a `Reply-To:' header. Consequently, replies not go to the author and not to the list. There was some lengthy discussion a while back about whether `Reply-To:' should be set, and if so what it should be set to. The consensus was to include it, and to set it to zsh-list. Do you not want to do this, or is there another way? -mb-