From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gatech.edu (gatech.edu [130.207.244.244]) by werple.net.au (8.7/8.7) with SMTP id CAA03476 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 02:31:22 +1000 (EST) Received: from math (math.skiles.gatech.edu) by gatech.edu with SMTP id AA08718 (5.65c/Gatech-10.0-IDA for ); Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:27:58 -0400 Received: by math (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA10181; Fri, 6 Oct 1995 12:24:26 -0400 Resent-Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 10:22:01 -0600 Old-Return-Path: Date: Fri, 6 Oct 1995 10:22:01 -0600 Message-Id: <9510061622.AA14289@charney.cdc.noaa.gov> From: Mark Borges To: acs@world.std.com Cc: P.Stephenson@swansea.ac.uk, zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: problem with 8-bit chars? In-Reply-To: <9510061554.AA08090@spacely.afive> References: <8075.9510061512@pygmy.swan.ac.uk> <9510061554.AA08090@spacely.afive> Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado X-Attribution: mb Resent-Message-Id: <"dpiQe1.0._U2.vWLTm"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/423 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu >> On Fri, 06 Oct 1995 11:54:30 -0400, >> Vinnie Shelton(V) wrote: V> In message <8075.9510061512@pygmy.swan.ac.uk>, V> P.Stephenson@swansea.ac.uk wrote: >> 1) I sent the reply by mistake just to Zoltan again. I do that every >> time I've been away from the keyboard for a while. V> Richard, can we please fix this? I would much rather see replies default V> go to the entire list. I have to say that I hated this at first, too, but now I think it makes some sense. Doesn't your mail reader make a distinction between `reply' and `follow-up'? I use VM, which does, and replies go only to the author, while follow-ups go to all recipients. VM also makes it easy to filter yourself out of the latter operation. Of course, this latter operation could also send duplicates to those on the list not using procmail. Or is Peter saying that the problem is that this behavior is not like most (is that true?) other mail lists (where replies do go to the list)? So he subconsciously reaches for the reply button because it's habitual. Anyway, I think this distinction is useful, but it's not a make-or-break thing for me. I guess I tried to add 2 cents, but it wound up being 1/20th of 1 cent. :-). -mb-