From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA21938 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 1996 06:15:58 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA27449; Tue, 16 Apr 1996 16:09:18 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 16:09:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <9604162004.AA10925@marathon.cs.ucla.edu> To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Yikes! Missing Patches in zsh-2.6-beta14... In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Apr 1996 21:57:55 +0200." <199604161957.VAA09278@turan.elte.hu> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 13:04:07 -0700 From: Eskandar Ensafi Resent-Message-ID: <"Adrz1.0.pi6.jv_Sn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/933 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Hello, > There are much more patches missing from beta14 from me and from other > people. About the init_term patch you included from me, I did not put it > into my release I used your patch doing the same in zle_misc.c in > putprompt(). I think that's a better placs for that. That was in atricle > 791. Thanks for reminding me... I actually checked to see if my zle_misc.c patch was included. It was not. I simply reposted your patch instead -- after all, a working patch is better than no patch at all... - Eskandar