From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA01140 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 03:51:53 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA23897; Wed, 22 May 1996 13:37:34 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:37:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <9605221738.AA20352@spacely.afive> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96 To: Zoltan Hidvegi Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Bogus tempfile names in beta18 In-Reply-To: hzoli's message of Wed, 22 May 1996 18:06:15 +0200. <199605221606.SAA29528@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> Reply-To: acs@world.std.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:38:19 -0400 From: Vinnie Shelton Resent-Message-ID: <"bclD63.0.Gr5.U3ren"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1124 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu In message <199605221606.SAA29528@bolyai.cs.elte.hu>, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote: >Did you notice that these filenames are different? Oops. Sorry about that. The first time I ran the test, I did it under beta17, and then when I ran my test script under beta18, I just did a visual inspection on the filenames. My apologies, vin