From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA12123 for ; Fri, 24 May 1996 05:36:01 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA02213; Thu, 23 May 1996 15:16:44 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 15:16:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "Barton E. Schaefer" Message-Id: <960523121716.ZM15776@zyrcon.z-code.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 12:17:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: Richard Coleman "Re: HISTCHARS" (May 23, 2:48pm) References: <199605231848.OAA19889@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> Reply-To: schaefer@z-code.ncd.com X-Face: czU|*h"p8AX?4.I.yU.^s%TIMx|"-s,*'|#H^|e,QjE&!jL%<]:-.U/;khS%3a2BC5_d#)( mz=$$G0u9P&*N8cA~b[URf;lgKRif@#qEf[ltie#Gg0%6$b`e`k.Cgw:\qJx\\a7c(K7^3;gXW:e1@ J, zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: HISTCHARS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"1E4l_3.0.SY.ScBfn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1154 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On May 23, 2:48pm, Richard Coleman wrote: } Subject: Re: HISTCHARS } } I think it makes more sense for it to be HISTCHARS, since this is consistent } with the case of HISTFILE and HISTSIZE. I now believe this to be more } important than compatibility with base or csh. Why not just mirror histchars/HISTCHARS, as with cdpath/CDPATH et. al.? -- Bart Schaefer Vice President, Technology, Z-Code Software schaefer@z-code.com Division of NCD Software Corporation http://www.well.com/www/barts http://www.ncdsoft.com/ZMail/