From: schaefer@z-code.ncd.com (Barton E. Schaefer)
To: Zefram <A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk>, jdl@clinicom.com (J.D. Laub),
zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Subject: Re: zsh, vi mode, vihistorysearchbackward
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:58:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <960619115807.ZM20491@zyrcon.z-code.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Zefram <A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk> "Re: zsh, vi mode, vihistorysearchbackward" (Jun 19, 6:04pm)
On Jun 19, 6:04pm, Zefram wrote:
} Subject: Re: zsh, vi mode, vihistorysearchbackward
}
} >I can see how "/" should seem to be "search forward" and "?" should be
} >"search backward", but this works exactly opposite as it did before.
}
} We are trying to emulate vi, rather than ksh. As a vi user, I find the
} new bindings much more intuitive -- ? is a backward search, so that's
} what I use to search backward through the history.
In point of fact, I never in memory have *ever* wanted to search forward
through the history. (If I had my druthers, *any* search other than an
immediate repeat of the previous search would always start at the current
command (the end of the history) and go backwards; treating the history
as if it were a file being edited makes no sense to me at all.) I think
the ksh behavior is more intuitive, because I don't think of history as
existing in more than one direction; so having two commands to search it
is confusing enough to begin with.
Further, it's really confusing to have ESC-/ fail to find something that
you know you typed only moments before. If `/' isn't going to search
backwards, then it at least ought to wrap around (like "wrapscan" in vi).
I don't use vi mode, so I haven't bothered complaining about it before.
} If you really want to have the default state match ksh, give everyone a
} .zshrc including these bindings.
Is there a way to tell from within the shell that it was invoked as ksh?
Perhaps an /etc/zshenv like this:
if [[ -o interactive && $0 = *ksh ]]
then
bindkey -a / vi-history-search-backward
bindkey -a \? vi-history-search-forward
fi
--
Bart Schaefer Vice President, Technology, Z-Code Software
schaefer@z-code.com Division of NetManage Corporation
http://www.well.com/www/barts http://www.ncdsoft.com/ZMail/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-19 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-06-19 16:44 J.D. Laub
1996-06-19 17:04 ` Zefram
1996-06-19 18:01 ` Hrvoje Niksic
1996-06-19 19:21 ` Zefram
1996-06-19 18:58 ` Barton E. Schaefer [this message]
1996-06-19 22:47 ` Richard Coleman
1996-06-20 0:10 ` Vinnie Shelton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=960619115807.ZM20491@zyrcon.z-code.com \
--to=schaefer@z-code.ncd.com \
--cc=A.Main@dcs.warwick.ac.uk \
--cc=jdl@clinicom.com \
--cc=zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).