From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id HAA25460 for <mason@werple.mira.net.au>; Thu, 20 Jun 1996 07:51:38 +1000 (EST)
Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA29887; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 17:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 17:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 96 23:25:18 +0200
From: braemer@doc.physi.uni-heidelberg.de (Achim Braemer)
Message-Id: <9606192125.AA29870@doc.physi.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Subject: Re: Problem with xterm, zsh-2.6Beta20 and OSF/1 
In-Reply-To: <9606192116.AA29834@doc.physi.uni-heidelberg.de>
References: <199606141245.AA13925@bob.pegasus.esprit.ec.org>
	<9606192116.AA29834@doc.physi.uni-heidelberg.de>
Resent-Message-ID: <"sS3NN.0.sI7.897on"@euclid>
Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
X-Mailing-List: <zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu> archive/latest/1369
X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu


Sorry, I have to correct my last posting:

Achim Braemer writes on June 19:
 > When I resize back to a width of 80 characters line editing is ok
 > again.

This statement is not true, it's still screwd (most of the time).

 > Very annoying.

This statement still holds.

-- Achim --