From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id QAA16219 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 16:50:38 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA02378; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 02:38:14 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 02:38:14 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960707233854.ZM7774@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 7 Jul 1996 23:38:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: Zoltan Hidvegi "Re: Remaining zsh3.0-pre2 bugs" (Jul 8, 2:48am) References: <199607080048.CAA05629@hzoli.ppp.cs.elte.hu> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.702 02jul96) To: Zoltan Hidvegi , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Remaining zsh3.0-pre2 bugs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"9MWMm.0.4b.LpAun"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1561 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jul 8, 2:48am, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote: } Subject: Re: Remaining zsh3.0-pre2 bugs } } The patch is quite big so please test it extensively as there may be some } cases when it does not behave the way it should. Well, tell me if this is "as it should" or not ... with this as the current input: zigzag<1> echo 'a b' Type send-break (ctrl-G). Now note: zigzag<2> history 1 echo 'a 2 history Should the first line of the never-executed command *really* have been put into the history at that point? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"