From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id GAA27029 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 1996 06:41:09 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA25462; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 16:37:43 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 16:37:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960719133845.ZM560@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 13:38:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: Zoltan Hidvegi "Re: Misc. unresolved stuff" (Jul 19, 9:30pm) References: <199607191930.VAA09905@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.702 02jul96) To: Zoltan Hidvegi Subject: Re: Misc. unresolved stuff Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"EJmLF1.0.kD6.M8_xn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1724 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jul 19, 9:30pm, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote: > Subject: Re: Misc. unresolved stuff > > > In zsh-users article 257, I asked why there's no (:L) modifier, to go > > with the (L) flag; similarly (U) and (:U). I also hoped for a better > > error message for unrecognized modifiers. Any comment? > > Tell me if you like the behaviour after applying this patch. Yes, that is better. I note that unrecognized glob modifiers are silently ignored; is that intentional? (I realize that this patch wasn't addressing globbing.)