From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id CAA04728 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 1996 02:05:44 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA11957; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 12:01:56 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 12:01:56 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960721090332.ZM18377@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 09:03:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: Zefram "More thoughts on emulation" (Jul 21, 10:20am) References: <6695.199607210920@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.702 02jul96) To: Zefram , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Z Shell workers mailing list) Subject: Re: More thoughts on emulation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"hqE1p.0.lw2.qHbyn"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1731 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jul 21, 10:20am, Zefram wrote: } Subject: More thoughts on emulation } } It seems that we want to treat the emulation mode as a special type of } option. [... As] we only have two sets of option letters, it might as } well be controlled by a(nother) normal option. This would immediately } make it subject to LOCAL_OPTIONS [...] What do you think? I wholeheartedly agree. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"