From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by melb.werple.net.au (8.7.5/8.7.3/2) with ESMTP id OAA08775 for ; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 14:34:32 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA20412; Sat, 27 Jul 1996 00:29:05 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 1996 00:29:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960726213003.ZM20287@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 1996 21:30:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: Zoltan Hidvegi "zsh-3.0-pre4 released" (Jul 27, 4:06am) References: <199607270206.EAA04563@hzoli.ppp.cs.elte.hu> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.702 02jul96) To: Zoltan Hidvegi Subject: Re: zsh-3.0-pre4 released Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"9Yi42.0.p-4.GiP-n"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1788 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jul 27, 4:06am, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote: } Subject: zsh-3.0-pre4 released } } Traps defined by a TRAPxxx function work as } before. TRAPxxx functions are undefined if the trap builtin is used to } modify the corresponding trap. Hmm ... you seem to be saying that TRAPHUP() { echo Hangup } trap "echo Hang UP" 1 causes an implicit "unfunction TRAPHUP". What, then, happens if trap "echo Hangup" 1 TRAPHUP() { echo Hang UP } ?? Does the TRAPHUP definition cause an implicit "trap - 1"? Or do both traps fire? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"