From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA01619 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 1996 02:28:52 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA04164; Sat, 3 Aug 1996 11:59:42 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 11:59:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960803090032.ZM404@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 09:00:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: Zoltan Hidvegi "Re: New zed and refresh bug" (Jul 29, 4:21pm) References: <199607291421.QAA03520@bolyai.cs.elte.hu> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.702 02jul96) To: Zoltan Hidvegi , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: New zed and refresh bug Cc: pws@ifh.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"B5nYp1.0.-01.kTt0o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1910 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jul 29, 4:21pm, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote: } Subject: Re: New zed and refresh bug } } I's even simpler. Since TMOUT is not special now, the patch below works. } Note that integer makes TMOUT local. Yes; WHY??? This seems completely counterintuitive to me. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"