From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA01811 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 1996 02:58:01 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA22074; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 12:44:06 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 12:44:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960807094302.ZM5300@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 09:43:02 -0700 In-Reply-To: Peter Stephenson "Re: 3.0-pre6 expansion bug" (Aug 7, 10:57am) References: <199608070857.KAA23899@hydra.ifh.de> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.702 02jul96) To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: 3.0-pre6 expansion bug MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"PTHVf.0.rO5.MVC2o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1931 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Aug 7, 10:57am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: 3.0-pre6 expansion bug } } > Attempt to inungetc() at start of input. } } I've handled this as a special case: the character is itself pushed } onto the stack for rereading. This doesn't happen very often --- } judging by the lack of previous bug reports --- so this should be fine. I've always wondered why inungetc() didn't just do that all along. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"