From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA02932 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 06:11:39 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA19891; Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:58:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960813125931.ZM2257@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 12:59:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: Zefram "Re: bug in zsh 3.0-pre6?" (Aug 13, 8:11pm) References: <28169.199608131911@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.729 29jul96) To: Zefram , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Z Shell workers mailing list) Subject: Re: bug in zsh 3.0-pre6? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"dSWX_3.0.js4.zvD4o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1960 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Aug 13, 8:11pm, Zefram wrote: } Subject: Re: bug in zsh 3.0-pre6? } } > if (hptr =3D=3D chline) } } Is the broken-printable lossage *really* necessary? It's a real } nuisance when trying to apply patches. I didn't get any lossage ... the problem appears to be that Zoltan is sending out Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit which isn't necessary (his message is all 7bit) but which causes "smart" ESMTP agents to convert to quoted-printable when gatewaying to an old SMTP (not 8-bit-clean) agent. Zoltan didn't do the encoding; it happened along the way somewhere. But Zoltan could have prevented it by using 7bit as his C-T-E, if he has that level of control over his mail client. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"