From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA04020 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 1996 06:31:24 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA09233; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:28:30 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:28:30 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960814132409.ZM13128@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 13:24:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: Zefram "Re: Old messages" (Aug 14, 8:05pm) References: <6389.199608141905@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.729 29jul96) To: Zefram , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Old messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"YFg0w2.0.CG2.jRZ4o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1976 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Aug 14, 8:05pm, Zefram wrote: } Subject: Re: Old messages } } I'd like to recommend against HTMLification of mail archives. The only } thing worse that broken-printable patches is HTML patches. Having the archives HTMLified doesn't necessarily mean you can't get to them as raw data. Have a look at http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/archive/ as an example. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"