From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA00636 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 1996 01:28:54 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA21155; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:28:26 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 11:28:26 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960827082850.ZM7886@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 08:28:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: "Greg J. Badros" "Distribution terms" (Aug 27, 10:25am) References: Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.729 29jul96) To: "Greg J. Badros" , Zoltan Hidvegi , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Distribution terms MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"gDaJ-2.0.TA5.OGn8o"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2077 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Aug 27, 10:25am, Greg J. Badros wrote: } Subject: Distribution terms } } Do you, Zoltan, or does anyone else know where I can find explicit } distribution terms for Zsh. I've looked the usual places, and not found } any information. I'm asking permission of the FSF to use the bit of } color_ls in zsh, but we need to let them know the distribution policy. Before you go through that hassle, perhaps we should have (a) a statement from Zoltan on whether he thinks the patches are worth including in the first place, and (b) a discussion on zsh-workers about that statement. I, for one, find this to be complete fluff and would just as soon skip it. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"