From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA04876 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 1996 04:06:53 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA01704; Tue, 24 Sep 1996 13:59:00 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 13:59:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960924110144.ZM6742@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 11:01:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: Louis.Granboulan@ens.fr (Louis Granboulan) "Re: Process substitution and shell functions" (Sep 24, 6:47pm) References: <199609241647.SAA22028@pleurote.ens.fr> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Louis.Granboulan@ens.fr (Louis Granboulan), zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Process substitution and shell functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"R4Dvz.0.YQ.a52Io"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2166 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Sep 24, 6:47pm, Louis Granboulan wrote: } Subject: Re: Process substitution and shell functions } } My patch moves the recovering of last_file_list from execpline } to execshfunc. } I don't understand why this was in execpline... It can't go in execshfunc because execshfunc isn't executed when using a simple builtin or an external command. I think you have the right idea, it's just that the wrong job entry was given the file list in the first place. Or something. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"