From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA12019 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 1996 04:35:48 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA13308; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 14:29:53 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 14:29:53 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <960926113216.ZM15404@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:32:16 -0700 In-Reply-To: Peter Stephenson "Re: Process substitution and shell functions" (Sep 25, 10:51am) References: <199609250851.KAA12941@sgi.ifh.de> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Process substitution and shell functions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"iDSqo1.0.pF3.WkiIo"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2174 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Sep 25, 10:51am, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: Process substitution and shell functions } } "Bart Schaefer" wrote: } > On Sep 24, 6:47pm, Louis Granboulan wrote: } > } My patch moves the recovering of last_file_list from execpline } > } to execshfunc. } > It can't go in execshfunc because execshfunc isn't executed when using } > a simple builtin or an external command. } } Does that matter? last_file_list was only ever set before from } execshfunc() and execcursh() via deletepipejob(). Ah, I missed that. I thought last_file_list was being used *every* time a job table entry was deleted. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"