From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: zsh-workers-request@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA24948 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 1996 09:30:25 +1000 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA06222; Tue, 15 Oct 1996 19:27:03 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 19:27:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <961015162944.ZM26504@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 16:29:44 -0700 Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Nit with history timestamps MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"Rf2Wf.0.8X1.6t1Po"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2237 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu I've just been playing with time-stamped history items, and I noticed an annoying side-effect of PUSHD_IGNORE_DUPS. The timestamp in the history reflects the *first* time the duplicated command was executed; I think it would be much more useful for it to record the *most recent* time that command was executed. Didn't the history patch that Peter posted some while back do this? What ever became of that patch WRT the baseline? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern New male in /home/schaefer: >N 2 Justin William Schaefer Sat May 11 03:43 53/4040 "Happy Birthday"