From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: zsh-workers-request@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA19208 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 05:29:45 +1100 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA14593; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 13:12:30 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 13:12:30 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <961101101635.ZM17970@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 10:16:35 -0800 Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: pushdcycle and pushdignoredups MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"vcEm72.0.xZ3.EsZUo"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2310 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu A while back, in his announcement of the test4 release I believe, Zoltan remarked that he thought my pushdcycle patch still needed some work with respect to pushdignoredups. As far as I can tell, the patch already works exactly as it should (that is, with pushdcycle unset, it works exactly as zsh did before the cyclic pushd behavior was added). Just what is it that is still needed? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern