From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: zsh-workers-request@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@euclid.skiles.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by coral.primenet.com.au (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id DAA15975 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 03:25:10 +1100 (EST) Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA27313; Fri, 22 Nov 1996 11:10:21 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 11:10:21 -0500 (EST) From: jdl@iasi.com ( JD Laub) Message-Id: <9611221609.AA24586@c3po.iasi.com> Subject: insert-last-word (was Re: zsh request) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 09:09:10 -0700 (MST) In-Reply-To: <961121025430.ZM1071@candle.brasslantern.com> from "Bart Schaefer" at Nov 21, 96 02:54:30 am Organization: The Psychiatric Ward of Terrors X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP3 *ALPHA*] Content-Type: text Resent-Message-ID: <"SvpiY1.0.eg6.i1Tbo"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2454 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Bart Schaefer writes: > } 1) insert-second-to-last-word (in the same spirit as insert-last word, > } which I use constantly) > > [...] ESC 1 ESC _ must count > from the right to be compatible with the past implementation (zsh is > not able to distinguish the 1 prefix from no prefix at all). Not that I'm objecting to the implementation, but I'm curious: gotmult gets set if the user supplied a prefix, with zmult storing the actual prefix. Am I missing something? -- J.D. Laub (Laubster) |"I think you're very, very, very, very, very, jdl@iasi.com |very, very, very, very, ..." - Flying Lizards