From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1616 invoked from network); 14 Dec 1996 05:09:46 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Dec 1996 05:09:46 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA10426; Fri, 13 Dec 1996 23:55:32 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 23:55:32 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <961213210021.ZM11408@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 21:00:20 -0800 In-Reply-To: Zoltan Hidvegi "bindkey bug?" (Dec 14, 4:29am) References: <199612140329.EAA05233@hzoli.ppp.cs.elte.hu> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Zoltan Hidvegi , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Zsh hacking and development) Subject: Re: bindkey bug? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"G232v3.0.oY2.3DZio"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2582 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Dec 14, 4:29am, Zoltan Hidvegi wrote: } Subject: bindkey bug? } } bindkey -s '^Z' '^[Qfg^M' } } In recent zsh versions after this command zsh thinks that ^Z is a prefix } and waits a half second before executing the string. That did not happen } in zsh-3.0.0. } } Does any of you know exactly which caused this changed? Are you sure it's ^Z that zsh thinks is a prefix? I'd be more suspicious that it thinks that the leading ESC in the expansion is a prefix. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern