From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9549 invoked from network); 16 Feb 1997 17:07:27 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 16 Feb 1997 17:07:27 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA05509; Sun, 16 Feb 1997 11:45:07 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 11:45:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <970216085158.ZM889@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 08:51:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: gwing@primenet.com.au "Re: Not *exactly* a bug, but ..." (Feb 17, 1:44am) References: <19970216144443.9329.qmail@primenet.com.au> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: gwing@primenet.com.au Subject: Re: Not *exactly* a bug, but ... Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"LH4Dd1.0.0M1.Jcp1p"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2900 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Feb 17, 1:44am, gwing@primenet.com.au wrote: } Subject: Re: Not *exactly* a bug, but ... } } Bart Schaefer wrote: } :I think I may have reported this before, a very long time ago ... } :zsh% fc -W >(....) } } This for specific commands? It works for me, eg. fc -W >(cat) Hmm. Looks like it only locks up if you use -I, e.g., fc -WI >(cat) is one of the commands that locks up for me. I thought I'd tried it both with and without -I, but maybe I'd only tried both -W and -A with -I. } Are you getting this both in older and newer versions? Yes, if I put the -I in there. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern