From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19984 invoked from network); 28 Feb 1997 17:51:33 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 28 Feb 1997 17:51:33 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA14949; Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:44:34 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 12:44:34 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <970228095224.ZM22989@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:52:24 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Zoltan T. Hidvegi) "Re: case $? fails" (Feb 28, 11:23am) References: <9702281623.AA15725@lotto.fishkill.ibm.com> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: (Zoltan T. Hidvegi), zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Zsh workers list) Subject: Re: case $? fails MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"ciREt3.0.Wf3.2cn5p"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2947 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Feb 28, 11:23am, (Zoltan T. Hidvegi) wrote: } Subject: Re: case $? fails } } Bart Schaefer wrote: } > I've now tried this a couple of different ways and can't get it to apply } > to 3.0.3-test4. Could you send a patch specifically for that? } } It applied cleanly for me after removing the first two hunks. But here is } the patch for 3.0.3-test4 anyway. Zoltan, all the tabs in your email message have been converted to spaces. That's why the patch failed to apply for me; this latest one fails, too. If I re-tabify with `unexpand -a` then it applies. I hope this doesn't have something to do with mailing from IBM's network. If you can't figure out why this is happening, you may have to start base64-ing or uuencoding you patches. :-( -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern