From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5872 invoked from network); 30 May 1997 16:59:07 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 May 1997 16:59:07 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA08732; Fri, 30 May 1997 12:49:02 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 12:49:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <970530095228.ZM4865@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 09:52:27 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20443.199705301615@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Comments: In reply to Zefram "Re: unique partial completion" (May 30, 5:15pm) References: <20443.199705301615@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Zefram , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: unique partial completion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"V0D7V1.0.K82.-JmZp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3172 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On May 30, 5:15pm, Zefram wrote: } Subject: Re: unique partial completion } } Anthony Iano-Fletcher wrote: } > argo% ls mod } > } >as it should (there are lots of mod* files) but there are no beeps } >or completion lists to indicate that this completion is incomplete. } } The indication that the completion is incomplete is that a space is } not inserted. Huh? In 3.0.3-test4, it beeps at me. I don't have a 3.1 compiled, but I can't call this an acceptable alternative; it's just not obvious enough. Bring back the beep. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern