From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16878 invoked from network); 4 Jun 1997 17:19:29 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Jun 1997 17:19:29 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA23205; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 13:12:22 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 13:12:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <970604101542.ZM21479@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 10:15:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <199706041601.SAA07220@hydra.ifh.de> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Bug in 3.1.2-beta compared with -test1" (Jun 4, 6:01pm) References: <199706041601.SAA07220@hydra.ifh.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Bug in 3.1.2-beta compared with -test1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"A5w-u2.0.Tg5.s7Qbp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3198 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jun 4, 6:01pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: Bug in 3.1.2-beta compared with -test1 } } Any advance on the following patch? inforeground Is this patch likely to be needed in 3.0.3 as well? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern