From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25341 invoked from network); 26 Jun 1997 23:07:42 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 26 Jun 1997 23:07:42 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA14843; Thu, 26 Jun 1997 19:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 19:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <9706262305.AA10233@tallowcross.uni-frankfurt.de> Content-Type: text/plain Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v118.2) In-Reply-To: <19742.199706262142@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 3.3 (Enhance 1.3) From: Uli Zappe Date: Fri, 27 Jun 97 01:05:23 +0200 To: Zefram , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: FAQ, German Umlauts (patch) References: <19742.199706262142@stone.dcs.warwick.ac.uk> Resent-Message-ID: <"nZODF2.0.pd3.3Jlip"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3314 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Zefram wrote: > If it's only needed if the system has a bug, then a run-time > option is the wrong way to do it. Make it a configure-time option > (--enable-pass8), and conditionally compile in such a special > version of isprint(), using it instead of the system's version. This sounds very reasonable. Is there a source for isprint() lying around somewhere? I could modify and/or at least test its correct behaviour for NEXTSTEP. Bye Uli _____________________________________________________________________ Uli Zappe E-Mail: uli@tallowcross.uni-frankfurt.de (NeXTMail,Mime,ASCII) PGP on request Lorscher Strasse 5 WWW: - D-60489 Frankfurt Fon: +49 (69) 9784 0007 Germany Fax: +49 (69) 9784 0042 staff member of NEXTTOYOU - the German NEXTSTEP/OPENSTEP magazine _____________________________________________________________________