From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11029 invoked from network); 11 Jul 1997 22:24:59 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Jul 1997 22:24:59 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA22486; Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:59:40 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 17:59:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <970711150347.ZM23730@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 15:03:47 -0700 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Jason R Mastaler "zsh 3.0.4 with IRIX 6.2/IDO" (Jul 11, 3:12pm) References: Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Jason R Mastaler , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: zsh 3.0.4 with IRIX 6.2/IDO MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"QlCOa3.0.EV5.Bpgnp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3362 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jul 11, 3:12pm, Jason R Mastaler wrote: > Subject: zsh 3.0.4 with IRIX 6.2/IDO > using the SGI C compiler (IDO). When configuring with GCC, the > compiler flags "-Wall -Wno-implicit -Wmissing-prototypes -O2" are Anything with a -W is just a warning. Unless you're planning to fix bugs, you can ignore them completely. > BTW, compilation did yield one non-fatal warning I thought I'd bring > to your attention. Otherwise, no problems. > > cc -c -I.. -I. -I. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 zle_tricky.c > cfe: Warning 709: zle_tricky.c, line 1553: Incompatible pointer type assignment > cb.foreach = (int ((*) (void) )) match_username; > -----------^ Yeah, the standard doesn't require that pointers to function be assignable to pointer to anything else. No unix compiler that I know of actually has that restriction.