From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6607 invoked from network); 27 Nov 1997 10:50:08 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Nov 1997 10:50:08 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA04612; Thu, 27 Nov 1997 05:34:26 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 05:34:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 1997 11:34:51 +0100 Message-Id: <9711271034.AA22366@gamma.informatik.hu-berlin.de> From: Sven Wischnowsky To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: Peter Stephenson's message of Thu, 27 Nov 1997 11:10:53 +0100 Subject: Re: PATCH: completion lists revisted Resent-Message-ID: <"BdZN23.0._71.ooKVq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/3637 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Peter Stephenson wrote: > ... > > I changed one additional piece of logic: the mere presence of an > explanation string used to force alternative completions not to be > tried. For example, > > compctl -k '(foo bar)' -X 'Yeah.' + -k '(Foo Bar)' foo > > would never look at the Foo Bar possibilities (`foo F^D' would just > mindlessly say `Yeah.'). Maybe someone can explain this. > I guess this is just a bug (at least I can't remember implementing it this way intentionally and this was probably my code). Bye Sven -- Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de