From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 880 invoked from network); 1 Jul 1998 18:48:44 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Jul 1998 18:48:44 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA11242; Wed, 1 Jul 1998 14:31:37 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 14:31:37 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <980701113257.ZM13854@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 11:32:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <9807011618.AA39366@ibmth.df.unipi.it> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Abort on parse errors" (Jul 1, 6:18pm) References: <9807011618.AA39366@ibmth.df.unipi.it> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu (Zsh hackers list) Subject: Re: Abort on parse errors MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"j6Lvf3.0.bl2.92ecr"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4193 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jul 1, 6:18pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Abort on parse errors } } I don't know how controversial this is going to be Looks fine to me. } It seemed more appropriate to pick SHINSTDIN instead of INTERACTIVE I agree. } Ksh will even abort initialisation scripts if they have a parse error. Which this will, too, given `setopt errexit`, right? I think that's fine, but perhaps in ksh emulation mode it should behave differently ... -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com