From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27567 invoked from network); 27 Oct 1998 05:14:01 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 27 Oct 1998 05:14:01 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id AAA03786; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:48 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 00:00:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <981026210405.ZM12601@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 21:04:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Tanaka Akira "Explanation for no completion candidates." (Oct 27, 10:50am) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail Lite (5.0.0 30July97) To: Tanaka Akira Subject: Re: Explanation for no completion candidates. Cc: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"WufbX.0.2x.0ELDs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4458 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Oct 27, 10:50am, Tanaka Akira wrote: > Subject: Explanation for no completion candidates. > However, zsh-3.0.5 and zsh-3.1.4 has different behavior on "-X". I think that's on purpose ... search the zsh-workers archive for the pattern compctl;explanation and you'll see quite a bit of discussion about it. The end of that thread seems to imply that your patch should not be used. Sorry that I seem to be announcing "BZZT! Thanks for playing" a lot here lately ... but please do try again.