From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27022 invoked from network); 4 Nov 1998 17:36:54 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 4 Nov 1998 17:36:54 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA25785; Wed, 4 Nov 1998 12:33:09 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 12:33:09 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <981104093112.ZM21273@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 09:31:12 -0800 In-Reply-To: <199811040904.KAA29172@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: bug in 3.1.4 completion" (Nov 4, 10:04am) References: <199811040904.KAA29172@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Sven Wischnowsky , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: bug in 3.1.4 completion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"3GH5x2.0.nI6.L_8Gs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4538 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Nov 4, 10:04am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: bug in 3.1.4 completion } } There was a missing fixsuffix() when inserting the unambiguous string } for normal completion. [...] } } Here is another missing call to fixsuffix() (fixed by the first } hunk). [...] There seem to be an awful lot of completion bugs related to missing or misplaced calls to fixsuffix(). Those bugs weren't present in 3.0.5. I was was not paying much attention to 3.1 until just before 3.1.4 (too busy with "real life") so I sort of glossed over all the changes that turned zle into a module, etc. Was whatever reorganization required the addition of fixsuffix() really a good idea? It doesn't -seem- like something that should need to be done in so many different places ... -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com