From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7348 invoked from network); 6 Nov 1998 16:38:30 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 6 Nov 1998 16:38:30 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA24739; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:36:38 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 11:36:38 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <981106083501.ZM2792@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 08:35:01 -0800 In-Reply-To: <199811060911.KAA04730@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: fixsuffix() again" (Nov 6, 10:11am) References: <199811060911.KAA04730@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> <9811061302.AA52410@ibmth.df.unipi.it> <199811061336.OAA05917@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <9811061302.AA52410@ibmth.df.unipi.it> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: fixsuffix() again" (Nov 6, 2:02pm) In-Reply-To: <199811061336.OAA05917@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: fixsuffix() again" (Nov 6, 2:36pm) X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: fixsuffix() again MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"4nNEI2.0.U26.LMoGs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4583 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Nov 6, 10:11am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: fixsuffix() again } } "Bart Schaefer" wrote: } } > So you mean with that one call to fixsuffix() in docompletion() we can } > get rid of all the other calls to fixsuffix() scattered about in other } > places? If so, then by golly I vote for putting that one back and } > nuking the others. } } The one in deletecharorlist() will still be need since it is in the } branch where completion is noct called. [...] With } fixsuffix() in docompletion() the slash is not removed, but with the } old style it is. It's not worth it, then. I thought you meant you could get rid of at least five of the other six calls that way. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com