From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15610 invoked from network); 7 Dec 1998 14:26:25 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 7 Dec 1998 14:26:25 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA08954; Mon, 7 Dec 1998 09:20:51 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 09:20:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <9812071403.AA69605@ibmth.df.unipi.it> To: Helmut Jarausch , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Snapshots In-Reply-To: "Helmut Jarausch"'s message of "Mon, 07 Dec 1998 14:16:06 NFT." Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 15:02:46 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Resent-Message-ID: <"h0b503.0.rB2.3H-Qs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4710 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Helmut Jarausch wrote: > As an onlooker only, I would like to make the suggestion, that some of > you prepare a snapshot which contains recent patches. > > I have just done that myself and it was somewhat hard and I am still not > sure I have got all patches. Still, it compiles and seems to run. > > Such a snapshot could be a patchbase for more recent patches. > Looking through the archived mailing list it was not always clear > which patch should have been applied first. I've been doing this, but quite deliberately haven't posted messages about it to zsh-users, since it's really for people who are involved in the discussions on zsh-workers. The official zsh-3.1.x releases are in any case betas, it didn't seem a good idea to spread the dirty washing out any further. It's at http://www.ifh.de/~pws/computing/zsh-3.1.5-patched.tar.gz It's a couple of weeks old and I'll probably update it once more before Christmas (I have a large module which I'm going to post before then). -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy