From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12208 invoked from network); 8 Dec 1998 16:11:48 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Dec 1998 16:11:48 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA17118; Tue, 8 Dec 1998 11:10:49 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 11:10:49 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <981208080819.ZM5570@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 1998 08:08:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: <199812081530.QAA30063@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "PATCH: module-defined conditions" (Dec 8, 4:30pm) References: <199812081530.QAA30063@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Sven Wischnowsky , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: PATCH: module-defined conditions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"_tuEo.0.PB4.9-KRs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4718 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Dec 8, 4:30pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: PATCH: module-defined conditions } } (I can easily be convinced to remove the code that } allows one to redefine builtin conditions, maybe it's too dangerous I think removing that code is a very good idea, especially if: } it would also simplify the code and zmodload...). -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com