From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6481 invoked from network); 15 Dec 1998 16:41:37 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Dec 1998 16:41:37 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA13731; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 11:40:21 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 11:40:21 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <981215083811.ZM6418@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:38:11 -0800 In-Reply-To: <9812151113.AA26395@ibmth.df.unipi.it> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "Re: Docs for rlimit" (Dec 15, 12:13pm) References: <9812151113.AA26395@ibmth.df.unipi.it> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Zsh Development Workers Subject: Re: Docs for rlimit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"gqcDV1.0.RM3.r3fTs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4808 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Dec 15, 12:13pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: Re: Docs for rlimit } } > The rlimits stuff is a module, but is documented as a builtin. I've } > just searched the HTTP archives and can't see anything documenting a } > reason for this. Is there one? } } Loading limit and ulimit, like sched, is transparent. I think the } idea was simply to move as much that was not part of the core shell } into modules. I thought the docs treated as a builtin any module that was in the default list to be linked in when building with --enable-static; but that doesn't doesn't seem to be true of sched. Maybe sched wasn't always in modules-bltn? -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com