From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7708 invoked from network); 17 Dec 1998 16:24:19 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 Dec 1998 16:24:19 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA09428; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:17:51 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:17:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <9812171601.AA53840@ibmth.df.unipi.it> To: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: PATCH: 3.1.5 + associative arrays: fix to keys, values In-Reply-To: ""Bart Schaefer""'s message of "Thu, 17 Dec 1998 05:40:42 NFT." <981217054042.ZM21030@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 17:01:30 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Resent-Message-ID: <"05YZj3.0.CJ2.lwIUs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4838 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu "Bart Schaefer" wrote: > } The remaining cases as far as I've tested seem fine. There is of > } course the point that the ordering is random (the `first' match of > } something could be any of them), but that's a feature of associative > } arrays which just needs to be made clear in the docs. > > I hope I did so ... Aha, this must be 4817, which it seems I missed during the Mathematica memory madness. Trying to get it from the list of recent patches seems to dump me straight back to the first mailing list archive screen, so I've had to search for it and get the html (55% so far...). Is this just my problem? -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy