From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6065 invoked from network); 3 Jan 1999 20:42:21 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 3 Jan 1999 20:42:21 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA22125; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 15:41:48 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 15:41:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990103124048.ZM1010@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 12:40:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Matt Gerassimoff "Cool idea for a zsh enhancement" (Dec 22, 1:42pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Matt Gerassimoff , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: Cool idea for a zsh enhancement MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"5LC8b2.0.eP5.BOzZs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4875 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Dec 22, 1:42pm, Matt Gerassimoff wrote: } Subject: Cool idea for a zsh enhancement } } Doing my everyday work within zsh. I had an interesting idea. What if } you could colorize the parameters during a zsh edit of the current } commandline? [...] I don't know if it could be done, but } I think is sounds kind of interesting. What do you think? I think you want to run your shell in an emacs buffer with font-lock mode enabled. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com