From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22986 invoked from network); 15 Jan 1999 16:38:13 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Jan 1999 16:38:13 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA06632; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:36:45 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:36:45 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990115083528.ZM26612@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 08:35:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: <9901151235.AA14633@ibmth.df.unipi.it> Comments: In reply to Peter Stephenson "PATCH: 3.0.5: typeset fix" (Jan 15, 1:35pm) References: <9901151235.AA14633@ibmth.df.unipi.it> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Peter Stephenson , zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: PATCH: 3.0.5: typeset fix MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"o2Vy13.0.Zd1.Twsds"@math> Resent-From: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/4919 X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jan 15, 1:35pm, Peter Stephenson wrote: } Subject: PATCH: 3.0.5: typeset fix } } This patch does that. The logic is different in 3.0.5 but I haven't } changed it except expanding out the long test like I did before. For } some reason 3.1.5 looks more like the pre-3 code I remember. This does not surprise me. There seem to have been a number of patches made between approximately 3.0.3 and 3.0.5 that were never propagated to 3.1.2 and later. Handling of SIGWINCH is another that comes to mind. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com