From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990127081541.ZM28632@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 08:15:40 -0800 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Karsten Thygesen "Re: List archive not tracking new home site?" (Jan 27, 3:39pm) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Karsten Thygesen , mason@primenet.com.au Subject: Re: List archive not tracking new home site? Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailing-List: 5066 On Jan 27, 3:39pm, Karsten Thygesen wrote: } Subject: Re: List archive not tracking new home site? } } No - now that I give it a second thought, you are right. This is not giving me great vibes about ezmlm. } Anyway - what other solutions can we come up with? Is there anybody or } anything besides the mail archive that uses the sequence numbers to } anything? Yes. When a patch gets applied, the ChangeLog file (or my own CVS commit logs, or PWS's patchlist.txt file) get the article number (formerly from the X-Mailing-List header) inserted into the log. That way anybody who wants to can go back to the original article to find out exactly what changed and what discussion led to the change. It's very important IMO that the article number on the HTTP archive site be the same as the one that appears on the message headers. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com