From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990128003614.ZM32429@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 00:36:14 -0800 In-Reply-To: <199901280754.IAA05492@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: Btw.: glob-qualifier" (Jan 28, 8:54am) References: <199901280754.IAA05492@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Sven Wischnowsky Subject: Re: Btw.: glob-qualifier Cc: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailing-List: 5072 On Jan 28, 8:54am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: Btw.: glob-qualifier } } Bart Schaefer wrote: } } > While I'm on the subject, why do we still have to use *numeric* group } > and user IDs for the u and g qualifiers? } } echo *(u:user:g:group:) } } Exists since 2.4. Oh, good grief. I probably even knew that, once. } Btw. You seem to prefer the syntax with *(u(user)). I don't prefer it, I was just scribbling an example. } In 3.1.5 this is not taken as a list of qualifiers Parens don't work in 3.0.5 either, ever since the (x|y) grouping syntax got introduced. (Now that I've actually read more than the first line of the info entry for the `uID' glob qualifier, I see that it still mentions parens even though they won't work.) -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com