Re: PATCH: Re: Btw.: glob-qualifier

["Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@brasslantern.com>]

On Jan 29,  2:37pm, Sven Wischnowsky wrote:
} Subject: PATCH: Re: Btw.: glob-qualifier
}
} > [...] (o(ug=w,o+r)) for "user and group must have exactly the write
} > bit set, and other must have at least r" and (o(u+x,go-w)) for "user
} > must have at least the execute bit set, and group and other must not
} > have write" and so on.
} 
} The patch below implements this (with a few extras).

Nifty!  Now I only have one question ... is there another, better letter
than `o' that could be adopted (since the mode is no longer `o'ctal),
thus giving us both o and O for ascending/descending sorts, as in the
parameter flags?

(I'd ask about this on zsh-users first, though, just in case anybody is
making some important use of the old undocumented `o'.)

-- 
Bart Schaefer                                 Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts              http://www.brasslantern.com