From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Mailing-List: contact zsh-workers-help@sunsite.auc.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <990203000604.ZM10089@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 00:06:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: <199902030745.IAA10571@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Wischnowsky "Re: PATCH: 3.1.5-pws-6: compctl manual revision" (Feb 3, 8:45am) References: <199902030745.IAA10571@beta.informatik.hu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: zsh-workers@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: Re: PATCH: 3.1.5-pws-6: compctl manual revision MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailing-List: 5194 On Feb 3, 8:45am, Sven Wischnowsky wrote: } Subject: Re: PATCH: 3.1.5-pws-6: compctl manual revision } } > appropriate so is intended to replace 5181 } } Hm, this is 5179 for me. } } > Unfortnately the expn.yo hunk will clash with the hunk in 5184 } } My 5184 doesn't contain a patch, maybe you mean 5183? But that doesn't } clash. This ezmlm numbering stuff is really beginning to annoy me. We aren't having different recipients getting different X-Seq: headers, are we? That would be absolutely awful. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com